Leo Borg vs Ryota Tanuma Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L L W W L
Form
L L W L L W W L W LHead-To-Head: Borg 1 - 0 Tanuma
They have played 2 sets in total, with Borg winning 2 and Tanuma winning 0. The last match between Borg and Tanuma was at the M15 Nakhon Si Thammarat, 20-08-2024, First, Hard with Leo Borg getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Leo Borg | 1 |
| Ryota Tanuma | 0 |
M15 Nakhon Si Thammarat(20-08-2024)
6
1
6
3
| Borg | Stats | Tanuma |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (11-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (1-1) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 496 | Ranking | 888 |
| 334 | Highest Rank | 518 |
| 21 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 2 |
| 52% (115-107) | Career Total W/L | 57% (293-220) |
| $9,880 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Pegula VS Uchijima PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Leo Borg
Player
Ryota Tanuma
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:11:0 | Average Match Time | 1:11:0 |
| 70% (32/46) | 1st Serve % | 61% (31/51) |
| 78% (25/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (18/31) |
| 71% (10/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (8/20) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 49% (25/51) | Return Points Win % | 24% (11/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Leo Borg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Leo Borg
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Sergi Fita Juan
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Marko Maksimovic
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Leo Borg
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tadeas Paroulek
Player
Leo Borg
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Tobia Costanzo Baragiola Mordini
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Leo Borg
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
95)
15
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
29 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamish Stewart
Player
Leo Borg
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Leo Borg
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Kristjan Tamm
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ryota Tanuma Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Ryota Tanuma
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryota Tanuma
Player
Noritaka Koizumi
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 6-7(6) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 7-6(1) 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryotaro Taguchi
Player
Ryota Tanuma
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Uisung Park
Player
Ryota Tanuma
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
11
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryota Tanuma
Player
Hiroki Moriya
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
75
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Ryota Tanuma
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (115/107) | Win/Loss | 57% (293/220) |
| 51% (255/246) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (641/504) |
| 49% (2337/2385) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5505/4825) |
| 64% (67/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (211/153) |
| 47% (42/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (67/52) |
| 22% (6/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52% (14/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 723 | Aces Total | 979 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 769 | Total Double Faults | 876 |
| 1:35:7 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 179.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 461.38 |
| 63% (9103/14517) | 1st Serve % | 60% (13067/21599) |
| 67% (6090/9103) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (8756/13067) |
| 48% (2612/5415) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4307/8533) |
| 43% (597/1403) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (963/2253) |
| 39% (5677/14485) | Return Points Win % | 40% (8806/21910) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (2/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 9% (1/10) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17% (5/25) | Challenger W/L | 35% (11/20) |
| 61% (107/68) | Futures W/L | 59% (282/199) |
| 52% (115/220) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (288/505) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 55% (35/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (53/106) |
| 59% (35/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (64/119) |
| 86% (112/96) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (294/264) |
| 14% (112/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (294/30) |
| 18% (110/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (219/30) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
